The darker buildings are closer, and lighter as they move further away. I've got my first rough draft of a larger fireworks image, finally having finished outlining the buildings. On Windows, if you win certain games (that come packed with Windows) it starts an animated fireworks display. Ooohh, I just thought of a fireworks animation that I could look at. Definitely not going to be realistic, but maybe I can make it at least look pretty. Then the fireworks will be above the buildings, and sort of in between the buildings, yet in front of the mountains. That's because the specific angle I'm using - I think I'm about 3000 ft distance, and roughly 340 ft above ground (below the top of some buildings!) - there's just nothing in that place where someone could stand, to take a photo! And the GE image is distorted itself anyway, so there will never be a chance that any of the image will be to scale. I'll just have to kind of visually estimate where to put the mountains, from the photos, which of course are not the same scale, or taken from the same position. Since the general angle I'm using is so popular, there are loads of photos I can use. So I'm using a different approach for the mountains. I don't know if it's just too far away, or if the main part of GE (which normally would show the mountain terrain) doesn't work with the 3D Building option.or maybe I just haven't found the right options yet. For reasons I don't understand, when I get the right angle for the building's skyline. Using Google Earth with the 3D Buildings option, I've managed to produce a skyline of Denver (which is the nearest major US city to where I live). The Midaxo+ software solution enables frequent acquirers to standardize their approach, visualize deal progress, and create value faster.Ok, now I'm on a fun project. Midaxo helps corporate development teams manage the entire M&A process from deal sourcing to evaluation and post-merger integration.
0 kommentar(er)
